Barrapunto

Si te lees la entrevista veras que no existe ese problema:

--------
Q: Can the issue of anonymity be divorced from the architecture of Freenet?

A: I think to a degree it can. I mean Freenet, the current Freenet architecture, is quite amenable if you want to create an anonymous publication system, which was our intention with Freenet, but anonymity is not an inherent part of the architecture.
--------

Y en la pagina Freenet Features:
"Both authors and readers of information stored on this system may remain anonymous if they wish"
Notese el: "...if they wish".

Y por ultimo, de la FAQ de Freenet:
http://freenet.sourceforge.net/index.php?page=faq#sec1.7
--------
  1.7. If authors are anonymous how can you trust information?

Cryptographic signing of information allows people to prove authorship, this technique is frequently used to authenticate authorship of emails. Moreover, you could actually sign information while remaining anonymous, thus having an anonymous persona. You could prove that you wrote different pieces of information on Freenet, without revealing your identity. In this way you could build up an anonymous reputation for reliability.
--------

Best regards

                        Uriel