Historias
Slashboxes
Comentarios
 
Búsqueda
Este hilo ha sido archivado. No pueden publicarse nuevos comentarios.
2006, el año de Linux | Log in/Crear cuenta | Top | 24 comentarios | Buscar hilo
Mostrar opciones Umbral:
Y recuerda: Los comentarios que siguen pertenecen a las personas que los han enviado. No somos responsables de los mismos.

  • Re:De la comunidad "open source" no sé...

    (Puntos:0)
    por pobrecito hablador el Jueves, 04 Enero de 2007, 10:19h (#861186)
    Además, te recuerdo que hay licencias Open Source que si bien te permiten ver el código, luego no puedes modificar ni distribuir libremente ese código aunque fueras a respetar la autoría del primero.

    Mientes y lo sabes, y si no mira los puntos 1 y 4 de la definición de Open Software:

    1. Free Redistribution

    The license shall not restrict any party from selling or giving away the software as a component of an aggregate software distribution containing programs from several different sources. The license shall not require a royalty or other fee for such sale.

            Rationale: By constraining the license to require free redistribution, we eliminate the temptation to throw away many long-term gains in order to make a few short-term sales dollars. If we didn't do this, there would be lots of pressure for cooperators to defect.

    3. Derived Works

    The license must allow modifications and derived works, and must allow them to be distributed under the same terms as the license of the original software.

            Rationale: The mere ability to read source isn't enough to support independent peer review and rapid evolutionary selection. For rapid evolution to happen, people need to be able to experiment with and redistribute modifications.


    [ Padre ]