By cloning, the Court means the creation of a piece of software which replicates the functions of another piece of software, even if the replication is accomplished by some means other than the literal repetition of the same source code.... In most instances, where a clone is created without a copyright violation, the clone emerges from a process of reverse engineering -- which consists of the study of functionality in the original product and the attempt to produce a product which accomplishes the same end.... The process of cloning the functionality of a competitor's product is usually an expensive and time-consuming undertaking which, if successful, will enable the cloned product to function as a replacement for the original product.
The judge says this kind of cloning could be done without infringing Microsoft's copyrights, but how about its patents? Prior to Bilski, one might give one answer. Now, one might give another.
Si en EEUU pueden clonar y todo se basa en que puedas defender las patentes que poseas, no te digo ya nada aquí que patentes de software ni en pintura.
Si en EEUU pueden clonar, no te digo ya nada aqu
(Puntos:0)http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20081102