por
pobrecito hablador
el Viernes, 28 Febrero de 2014, 11:32h
(#1356124)
Ya que usas una falacia de autoridad, como si Dijkstra no pudiese equivocarse o su opinion no tuviese un debido contexto (spoiler: lo tiene [stackoverflow.com]), te voy a responder con otra falacia de autoridad y voy a nombrar a Donald Knuth y Linus Torvalds [wikipedia.org]:
An alternative viewpoint is presented in Donald Knuth's Structured Programming with go to Statements[5] which analyzes many common programming tasks and finds that in some of them GOTO is the optimal language construct to use. Some programmers, such as Linux Kernel designer and coder Linus Torvalds or software engineer and book author Steve McConnell, also object to Dijkstra's point of view, stating that GOTOs can be a useful language feature, improving program speed, size and code clearness, but only when used in a sensible way by a comparably sensible programmer.[6][7]
Falacia de autoridad
(Puntos:1, Inspirado)An alternative viewpoint is presented in Donald Knuth's Structured Programming with go to Statements[5] which analyzes many common programming tasks and finds that in some of them GOTO is the optimal language construct to use. Some programmers, such as Linux Kernel designer and coder Linus Torvalds or software engineer and book author Steve McConnell, also object to Dijkstra's point of view, stating that GOTOs can be a useful language feature, improving program speed, size and code clearness, but only when used in a sensible way by a comparably sensible programmer.[6][7]